ArticleSurf article publishing script homepage.
[Valid RSS feed]
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese
  Number Times Read : 6      
Categories

Akumal Travel Articles
Advice
Aging
Arts and Crafts
Automotive
Break-up
Business
Business Management
Cancer Survival
Career
Cheating
Computers and Technology
Cooking
Culture
Dating
Death
Education
Entertainment
Etiquette
Family Concerns
Finances
Food and Drinks
Gardening
Home Management
Humor
Internet
Jobs
Leadership
Legal
Marketing
Marriage
Medical Business
Medicines and Remedies
Opinions
Parenting
Pets
Politics
Real Estate
Recreation
Relationships
Religion
Self Help
Short Stories
Society
Sports
Travel
Wellness, Fitness and Di
Womens Interest
World Affairs
Writing
 
Stats
Total Articles: 74038
Total Authors: 9746
Total Downloads: 417348


Newest Member
ratnesh pandya

 


   

Reusable Versus Disposable Goods



[Valid RSS feed]  Category Rss Feed - http://www.articlesurf.com/rss.php?rss=296
By : David Kraft    4 or more times read
Submitted 2009-10-07 07:26:18
In 1994, chemistry professor Martin B. Hocking conducted a study that focused on a life cycle assessment of different kinds of reusable and disposable cups in terms of their energy usage and consumption. The results of the study challenged what was then conventional wisdom about some of these products. Dr. Hocking documented the amount of energy required to produce and reuse cups made from various materials. The conclusions were somewhat shocking the study concluded that in some cases, using paper and polystyrene cups is actually more energy efficient than other alternatives. For example, when the amount of energy consumed during the production of a ceramic cup is weighed against the energy required to produce plastic cups, the ceramic cup must be used 1,006 times before the user breaks even (versus using 1,006 plastic cups). However, this number does not account for the energy consumed to wash the cup. When that energy is considered, the ceramic cup never breaks even with the polystyrene cup because it often takes more energy to wash a ceramic cup than it does to produce one polystyrene cup. The same study compared numerous cups and materials and the break even point between reusables and disposables was much smaller for some other materials. For example, when comparing glass mugs to paper cups, the break even point for the glass mugs was only 15 uses. In any case, the study was successful in that it prompted people to consider the factors that are in play when they opt for reusable alternatives. The simple fact is that some things aren t as eco friendly as you might think...at least when it comes to energy consumption.

But, energy consumption is not all this is involved in the analysis when you compare disposable versus reusable bags, cups, and any other disposable versus reusable product. Things like disposal, recyclability, toxic chemicals that the factories release during production, and other environmental factors must also be considered. Polystyrene may consume less energy in it s production, but it isn t biodegradable or recyclable and takes centuries to degrade in landfills, leading to overfilling of landfills. Paper cups can be recycled and are more biodegradable, but the factories that produce paper cups and other paper products are some of the biggest polluters in the world. Further, paper cups require a great amount of water to produce and obviously require the deforestation of millions of acres of trees. Plastic cups are petroleum based (like all plastic products). Petroleum is a finite resource but is also something that is toxic to soil, air, water, and wildlife when it is disposed of improperly, extracted, refined, and/or spilled.

Of course, every product (reusable or disposable) has an impact on the environment in some way or shape. This makes it difficult to find the optimal solution in every case. Although things like reusable bags, reusable containers, and reusable cups seem like better alternatives than their disposable counterparts, it is important that consumers are informed when making those decisions. For example, reusable shopping bags made from organic cotton are more environmentally friendly than bags made from non organic cotton and bags made from recycled materials are generally more eco friendly than either organic or non organic cotton. When it comes to cups, stainless steel mugs are less eco friendly than ceramic cups even though stainless steel mugs are made largely from recycled materials because the greenhouse gas emissions associated with producing mugs from stainless steel. If you re ever in doubt about what is the best alternative, you can generally opt for recycled goods and know that you re having a positive impact on our environment.
Author Resource:- David Kraft writes a number of articles about green living and eco-friendly products. Learn more about the benefits of reusable shopping bags at http://www.reusablebagsdepot.com
Article From Article Surf

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.




Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
Rate This Article
Vote to see the results!

Do you like this article?
  • Yes.
  • Not Sure.
  • No.
New Members
select
Sign up
select
Learn More
 
Nav Menu
Home
Login
Submit Articles
Submission Guidelines
Top Articles
Link Directory
About Us
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
RSS Feeds

Actions
Print This Article
Add To Favorites

 
Sponsors

Akumal House for Rent